Stefanie Stantcheva | Innoscape Talk #13

May 2026 by Rolf Weder (Interviewer). CIEB | University of Basel

Taxation and Innovation

How do tax systems affect people’s decision on innovation? And how can tax policy be aligned with public expenditures to spur innovation? What can economists do if people erroneously perceive innovation as a zero-sum situation?

In our Innoscape Talk we asked these and other difficult questions to Prof. Stefanie Stantcheva, Professor of Political Economy at Harvard University and recipient of the 2025 John Bates Clark Medal. Her research offers new insights on the relationship between taxation and innovation which are of highest interest to governments when designing their fiscal policy.

Professor Stantcheva’s ability to discuss this theme and to answer all the questions is impressive: She explains the complex effects of taxation on innovation or the possibilities of public support of innovation in simple terms without, however, compromising too much on the precision of the argument. If you read the scientific articles published in the journals that may pop up on the screen during the Innoscape Talk, you will understand what we mean.

The conversation starts with the challenges that exist when undertaking conclusive academic research on the effects of taxation on inventors and firms. Results of the long-run analysis are discussed, including the effects of taxes on top inventors and the importance of also taking into account the expenditure side of the fiscal policy. In the second part, individual tax instruments, their mix and implementation in practice are briefly discussed. The conversation also touches upon the taxation of start-up firms. Prof. Stantcheva shares her thoughts on the OECD minimum (corporate) tax and on what countries may do, given that this tax exists (and not all countries apply them). Finally, the discussion on taxation and innovation relates to Stantcheva’s most recent research on zero-sum thinking and ends with a question on what economists can do to prevent that people may perceive positive-sum situations as zero sum.

This episode offers a research-based perspective on one of the central questions of modern economic policy: what should societies take into account when designing a tax system which is able to collect tax revenue for the government to finance government expenditures, but which does not hinder—or even encourage--innovation by risk-taking individuals and firms.

Prof. Stephanie Stantcheva draws on her pathbreaking academic contributions over the last 10 years, published in the leading journals in economics, such as the American Economic Review, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Econometrica, Journal of Political Economy and Review of Economic Studies. Her recent work explores people’s attitudes towards taxation, trade, immigration, climate change, and social mobility using large-scale Social Economics Surveys and Experiments. It was a pleasure to have Stephanie at the Center of Innovation Economics Basel (CIEB) of the Faculty of Business and Economics of the University of Basel in December 2025!


Content of the Interview

00:25 What was your reason to enter innovation and taxation, a very complex field of research?
01:57 At the beginning of your research on this topic, did you have doubts whether taxation affects innovation?
03:42 What challenges did you face when trying to analyze the effects of taxation on innovation in the long run?
06:23 What did you find out?
09:54 What would you recommend to policymakers to align the level of taxation with the provision of public goods, given that both affect innovation?
11:20 How does taxation affect top inventors?
16:18 In your research, taxation does not appear to affect the quality of innovation. Do you have an idea why this is the case?
18:02 Let us talk about individual tax instruments and their impact on innovation. What do we learn from your fundamental paper published in Econometrica?
19:43 How can the government set the right policy mix, not knowing which firms are the good innovators?
22:20 Do you have examples where this happened in practice?
24:41 How about taxing start-up firms – don’t we have to be careful not to overburden them as soon as they become successful?
26:10 There is a lively discussion whether countries should in fact pursue active “Industrial policies” to foster innovation in particular fields. What is your perspective on this?
29:03 How do you evaluate the OECD minimum (corporate) tax strategy from the perspective of innovation?
31:25 Given a minimum tax across countries, how would you design a framework that uses some of the tax revenue to promote innovation?
32:49 Your research agenda also includes a number of projects on “zero-sum thinking”. How is this research related to your work on innovation?
36:18 Given that innovation may lead to technologies that challenge established ways of doing things, isn’t it likely that it is perceived by many people as a zero-sum situation?
38:33 What can we, as economists, do to help that people do not perceive positive-sum situations as zero sum?

Interview: Rolf Weder
Question Script: Rolf Weder, Dragan Filimonovic, Christian Rutzer, Till Schmidlin
Production: Media Center University of Basel
Edited: Studio Frich

Disclaimer: The Innoscape Talk series exclusively conveys the opinion of its interviewed experts. It is not intended to represent the position or opinion of the University of Basel or the CIEB. Nor is it the official position of any staff.

©2026 All Rights Reserved

Center for Innovation Economics Basel | CIEB University of Basel